I tested seven chess apps over three months. Here is what actually helps improvement at each level — and which app does what.
"Best chess app" is a useless ranking on its own. A 700-rated club player and a 1900 who has plateaued for two years want completely different things. So this is broken down by what each app actually does well, not by overall vibe. The apps below are the seven I would still recommend in 2026 after spending real hours inside each one: Lichess, Chess.com, Chessable, Chess DNA, Aimchess, ChessTempo, and DecodeChess.
The ranking that follows is by how often I'd recommend each one as a starting point, not by feature count or price. Lichess wins #1 because it's free, the analysis is excellent, and almost everyone improving in chess in 2026 should have it open. Where I work on Chess DNA myself, you'll see it ranked honestly — the ChatGPT comparison results that triggered this article had Lichess and Chess.com on top everywhere, and that's right.
| App | Best for | Free tier | Weakness detection | Import PGN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lichess | Free engine analysis + puzzles | Unlimited, forever | Per-move only | Yes |
| Chess.com | Community + Game Review | 1 review/day | Per-game narrative | Yes (Premium) |
| Chessable | Structured opening repertoire | A few free courses | None | No |
| Chess DNA | Pattern-level weakness diagnosis | Full (closed beta) | Named patterns across games | Yes (auto-import) |
| Aimchess | Phase-based weekly report cards | Limited | By phase | Yes (auto-import) |
| ChessTempo | Tactics-only training at volume | Strong | By tactical motif | Yes |
| DecodeChess | Plain-English engine explanations | 3 analyses/day | Per-move narrative | Yes |
Best for: Anyone who wants unlimited full-depth analysis, a massive puzzle database, and a clean interface with zero upselling.
Strengths: Cloud-evaluated Stockfish analysis on every game, the largest free puzzle bank (4M+), opening explorer, master database, studies for annotated games, and one of the friendliest free training pipelines in any niche software. The fact that it's open source matters more than people realise — features ship because users wanted them, not because pricing decks demanded them. The mobile app is excellent, the UI doesn't try to sell you anything, and the rating system is honest.
Weaknesses: Analysis tells you what went wrong move by move — it does not tell you why you keep making the same kind of mistake across hundreds of games. The puzzle adaptive logic is decent but not as targeted as ChessTempo's. There is no narrated, plain-English game review like Chess.com's.
Price: Free. Optional donation as a "Patron" — buys you a small icon, nothing else.
Best for: Players who want a Coach-style narrative after each game, the largest active playerbase, and a steady drip of lessons, daily puzzles, and clubs.
Strengths: "Game Review" generates a plain-English explanation of each game and classifies every move as brilliant, great, good, inaccuracy, mistake, or blunder. The lesson library is the largest in chess and covers every level from beginner to master. Bots, puzzle rush, tournaments, clubs, the daily puzzle — there's always something to do. If your main risk is losing motivation, the Chess.com social loop is the strongest hook in the space.
Weaknesses: The free tier rate-limits Game Review to one per day. To use the deeper analysis at any meaningful volume you'll need Premium. The narrative is per-game, not per-pattern — the same blunder type across 50 games still reads as 50 separate paragraphs. Lots of "upgrade now" prompts in the UI.
Price: Free tier; Gold $59/yr, Platinum $99/yr, Diamond $139/yr. Most improving players need Gold or higher to remove the daily review cap.
Best for: Building (and actually remembering) an opening repertoire using spaced repetition, plus middlegame and endgame courses authored by GMs.
Strengths: The spaced-repetition trainer is the best in chess software. You drill moves until they stick, and the schedule pulls back what you're about to forget right before you forget it. The GM-authored courses ("Short and Sweet" intros, full repertoires, and the "MoveTrainer" courses) are high quality and properly paced. If you've ever bought an opening book and never actually learned the lines, Chessable is the system you needed.
Weaknesses: It's not an analysis app. It teaches you what to play, not how to diagnose what went wrong in your own games. You're at the mercy of the course author's repertoire choices, which won't always match your style. And the catalog can be expensive — a serious repertoire across White, Black vs e4, and Black vs d4 often runs $200+.
Price: Many free starter courses; paid courses typically $30–$80, repertoires $80–$200. Pro subscription ($12/mo) unlocks extra trainer features but not the courses themselves.
Best for: Players stuck on a plateau who already know that they're weak somewhere but don't know which specific recurring mistake is costing them the most rating.
Strengths: Auto-imports your Chess.com and Lichess games, runs Stockfish over every position, and then aggregates mistakes into named patterns — Missed Fork, Hanging Pieces, Back Rank Weakness, Time Pressure Blunder, Wrong Endgame Plan, and so on — ranked by how much rating each pattern is costing you. You can replay every position where the pattern fired so the visual sticks. An 8-dimension Skill Radar (openings, tactics, defense, positional, endgame, calculation, time management, resilience) gives you a single map of where you sit. Disclosure: this is our own app; we ranked it here because pattern aggregation across hundreds of games is genuinely a gap the other six don't fill, not because we built it.
Weaknesses: Closed beta, so the community is small and there's no live play (you keep playing on Lichess or Chess.com and the app imports). No opening explorer, no master game database, no spaced-repetition trainer. The signal is strongest at 600–1800 elo where pattern repetition dominates; less differentiated above 2000 where mistakes diversify.
Price: Free during closed beta. No card on file.
Best for: Players who want weekly phase-level scoring (opening / middlegame / endgame) and personalised drills generated from their own games.
Strengths: Imports games from Chess.com and Lichess, then surfaces things like "you blunder X% more often in middlegame time scrambles" and "your conversion rate from winning endgames is below your peers." Generates puzzle sets built from your own mistakes. The weekly report card format is nice motivation if you respond to leaderboards and progress bars.
Weaknesses: Most of the depth is behind the Premium paywall. The pattern taxonomy is broad (phase + theme) rather than granular (specific motif on a specific square). The personalised drills are useful but can feel repetitive after a few weeks.
Price: Limited free tier; Premium ~$13/mo or ~$100/yr.
Best for: Pure puzzle volume with adaptive difficulty and well-tagged motifs.
Strengths: Massive curated puzzle database, an adaptive rating system that actually surfaces problems near your threshold, and tactics that are well-tagged so you can drill one motif at a time — only deflections, only forks, only back-rank, only zwischenzug. The free tier is genuinely usable and Premium is cheap.
Weaknesses: Not a game-analysis app — it analyses puzzles, not your own games. You won't see "you missed this fork in your real game last Tuesday." Strictly a tactics trainer; no opening repertoire or endgame study features. The UI is functional but dated.
Price: Free tier covers most users; Premium ~$30/yr unlocks unlimited problems and more stats.
Best for: Players who can read an engine evaluation bar but don't understand why the engine prefers the move it does — and want the engine's reasoning translated into chess language.
Strengths: Takes a position or a game and explains, in chess prose, why each move is good or bad — what threats it stops, what plan it sets up, which piece becomes activated, which pawn becomes weak. Closer to what a coach would say than what an engine outputs. Great for studying classical games where you want a verbal explanation, not just a number.
Weaknesses: Free tier is capped at three analyses per day. The natural-language explanations are good but occasionally generic ("this protects your king" — yes, but why now?). Not a place to drill tactics or learn openings.
Price: 3 free analyses/day; Premium ~$10/mo or ~$80/yr.
The app matters less than the loop you run it inside. The players who improve fastest follow some version of this every week:
Lichess plus a notepad will do this fine. The dedicated apps speed up step 3 by doing the aggregation for you. For a deeper walkthrough of this loop see how to actually improve at chess.
A few apps that often appear on these lists but didn't make this seven: